Over 59614

Sperate Politics

NOVEMBER'S COMING - Can't you tell by the smell of desperate Democrats in the air???... the odor of bullshit campaign promises coming from their mouths...the smear attacks, etc....??

BAIN CAPITAL - The only ones who care about when Romney left Bain are desperate Democates and Trivial Pursuit

OBAMA'S WEEK IN REVIEW - Lowest polls ever. Gas passing $4, Chevy Volt still can't sell. Deficit $3.5 trillion higher than thought. Obamacare cost doubles. Afghanistan unravelling. Phoney "War on Women" claims Maher instead of Limbaugh.

LATEST POLL NUMBERS IN - stupid is as stupid does........

AW CRAP - its getting closer to desperate liberal season again. Say, do anything to win an election, because their policies, like ther promises are empty, so they have to demonize their opponentts to win

GAG ORDER - Because Gloria Allred needs to STFU!

ECONOMIC FACTS AND DATA - Obama supporters have a defense mechanism.

THEY CALL US JACK BAUER REPUBLICANS - Other liberals who foam at the mouth when they talk call us tea baggers. We prefer the term Conservative Constitutionalists.

THE PARTY OF..... - High unemployment, foodstamps, welfare, hate-speech, corruption, poverty and misery


DESPERATION - Does not want soldiers voting in key states!

John Tyler -




DEMOCRATIC ATTACK ADS - Because nothing screams "distance yourself from Obama and his agenda and your previous support of it" by running nothing but attack ads


FREE STUFF REALLY ISN'T FREE - Obama will forgive student loan debt if students won't forget to vote for him.

DESPERATE FOR A POLITIFAKE T-SHIRT - but I'm not unemployed, so I can't post the same repeated phrases several times a day, nor the same photos numerous times a week

TAGS: desperate
Rating: 4.2/5

More politifakes by JGalt

deerbag2 - November 27, 2012, 3:38 pm
PapaFox - November 27, 2012, 10:37 am
LMAO! *Thumbs up*

RABID DEMOCRATS - They're everywhere this year!

THE NEW DIRTY WORD: - Q: What's the worst thing you can call someone? A: A Democrat

WHORE-GATE - Because releasing a recorded phone call with a "whore" comment has so much more class than a TV commercial saying the same thing. Shame Shame, Jerry Brown.

PARANOIA - sheesh. Now Axelrod and Obama think that foreign interests are taking over our Chambers of Commerce and funding secret agendas! Poor Desperate Dems, must be election time again!

SOCIAL OUTCAST - Dems are avoidng Bammy when he comes to town. He can't fill a room when tickets are discounted. Rumor has it he will be appearing on Letterman, Leno and MTV before Nov. 2.

LIBERAL PUNDITS - Are working really hard to show some excitement over the thrashing that will take place Nov. 2nd

NOV 2ND - Watch as election day approaches and desperate democrats start to use dirty tricks, rhetoric and outright lies to get elected!

FACT-FREE ZONES - Democrats are known to live in them.

THE DOUBLE STANDARD - David Axelrod invents the scandal that foreign money is seeping through our Chamber of commerce to influence Republican races, while George Soros is actually dumping millions into Democrats in the final hours.

DESPERATE DEMOCRATS - Democrats keep saying Republicans will gut Medicare, although Dems already did it with the passage of Obamacare. I think they are having a senior moment themselves!

9TH COMMANDMENT - Apparently Democrats seeking re-election perceive they have an exemption to several of the 10 Commandments.

Jared Kushner did the same thing Obama did in 2008, and many other presidents -

The Amazing, Desperate Democrats... -

TAGS: desperate
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by JohnGalt

fauxnews - August 4, 2016, 5:30 pm
So brace yourself,TT. Do you hear that calm before the storm? Republikkklan heads are about to explode all over the blogosphere and internet: Trump supporters' excuses, conspiracy theories, whining, and tempertantrumps to begin in 3...2...1
fauxnews - August 4, 2016, 5:23 pm
Seriously,not only is Trump sinking like the Titanic in the polls BUT as an added bonus his implosion's becoming SO big,control of Congress is at risk! Senate races track Pres.races up and down fairly closely.Hard for the GOP to escape this fate.Doh!(2/2)
fauxnews - August 4, 2016, 5:15 pm
Republican politicians are already defecting.Mike Coffman,Republican from CO, is the 1st House Republican to use anti-Trump messaging in paid advertising.Because,you know,Trump is supposedly 'crushing' Hillary in the polls.lol(1/2)
truthteller - August 4, 2016, 3:24 pm
FYI,Sam's Wang IS a smarter head than your's:HuffP(Clinton 47.1%>Trump40.4%)Dornsife/LA Times(Clinton+1),Rasmussen(Clinton+4),Did you notice that I'm using your polls,and "right-leaning" ones as well?Truth'spinner' is right.I'm ROFLCOPTER over the "truth"
truthteller - August 4, 2016, 3:07 pm
That's funny. I looked back at "your comments" and you were practically blowing the press when you thought the pollsters had Trump ahead. And now,NBC News(Clinton +8),CNN(Clinton+9),FOX News(Clinton+10).All polls averaged: Hillary 78.4% > Trump 21.6%
BlackIsBeautiful - August 2, 2016, 11:55 am
With all the ridiculous excuses you make for Trump it is obvious you are an enthusiastic supporter. If the shame makes you deny it, maybe you should reconsider him as an candidate. If it quacks like a duck, and looks like one,your probably a quack,Mr.Duck
fauxnews - July 22, 2016, 8:59 am
In the last election in 2012, your partisan conservative source Rassummen predicted Romney ahead. My non-partisan source Sam Wang predicted Obama ahead. And we know how that turned out. I will let the facts speak for themselves. Cheers :^)
fauxnews - July 22, 2016, 8:57 am
Rassummen said 'that-exact-same-thing-the-last-time-about-the-polling' when Obama was ahead of Romney. Wanna take a wild guess how that conspiracy theory (without evidence) played out? Reputable sources like Sam Wang are careful to get 'objective' data
fauxnews - July 22, 2016, 8:53 am
*dangerous(typo) = *dangers
fauxnews - July 22, 2016, 8:52 am
But, the truth is - Michael Moore is trolling you guys ;^) In that interview on Real Time, he went on to say that his words were more about the dangerous of "complacency." He also boasted of Kerry winning in 2004.Yeah,that worked out for him.Cheers(2/2)
fauxnews - July 22, 2016, 8:50 am
LOLOLOLOLOL...So, Michael Moore suddenly tells you Republicans what you want to hear and suddenly you listen to him? LOL - Between the conspiracy theories and flip-flops, the Trump mvt., is proving to be God's practical joke on radical conservatives(1/2)
JohnGalt - July 22, 2016, 6:14 am
Democratic oversampling keeps hilliary ahead in the polls.
JohnGalt - July 22, 2016, 6:12 am
Michael Moore seems to think its over and its Trump's election to lose.
fauxnews - July 22, 2016, 12:23 am
Hey,"HillaryHussainObama"... nothing left to say?Seems I pushed one too many of your b'uttons.YOU finally "bowed in defeat." :^) Told you that you were projecting ;^) It's good to be "the King" X^D Dont let the door hit you on your way out.Cheers,"mate."
fauxnews - July 22, 2016, 12:14 am
P.S. "Sporting of you to bow out in defeat." X^D Enjoy your 'vacation'. Cheers,"mate."
fauxnews - July 22, 2016, 12:10 am
...I'm not here for an argument over 'semantics.'(which you are wrong, in any case). I'm simply pointing out to you, a science-denier, its proven track record on this. Enjoy your denial.
fauxnews - July 22, 2016, 12:04 am
Nah, it is too busy screwing you in the arse (and screw you is right, since Trump is losing.) X^D Sam Wang, in that sense, is also 'a polling a***yst.' You are the one trusting 'pollsters' in the singular sense by listing your cherry-picked polls...
xyzzy001002 - July 22, 2016, 12:02 am
It will be fun to continue this conversation in about a week or so
xyzzy001002 - July 22, 2016, 12:00 am
Well, this has been fun, but I have to leave now - vacation starts tomorrow morning and it's a long drive with our camper.
fauxnews - July 22, 2016, 12:00 am
And if the models were as bad as you make it seem,then Sam Wang wouldnt have such a solid track record predicting these things.Basically you are just another fundy trying to disprove science with idiotic anecdotal observations and emotional reasoing
xyzzy001002 - July 21, 2016, 11:59 pm
statistician =/= pollster. Pollsters collect data, statisticians a***yse it. Looks like no matter which head I think with, it out thinks you
fauxnews - July 21, 2016, 11:58 pm
Your claims in Comment#80925 is using your a$s as the source. In other words, you are making things up now. The models are not straw polls. The methodology they use take into 'variance', which is what you are referring to.
fauxnews - July 21, 2016, 11:55 pm
Nathaniel Read "Nate" Silver (born January 13, 1978) is an American statistician (i.e. Statisician = pollster). But as you admitted in comment#80922, you think with the wrong 'head', the one without a brain. So that explains that idiotic comment.
fauxnews - July 21, 2016, 11:53 pm
...but Sam Wang, humble as he was, stuck with the polls and has been riding strong since. Silver does use models, but didn't in the case of Trump, which is when I said adios and stuck with Sam Wang...
xyzzy001002 - July 21, 2016, 11:53 pm
what the models don't take into consideration is the number of dems who are too embarrassed to say they are voting for trump and the number of republicans who are the same toward hillary
xyzzy001002 - July 21, 2016, 11:51 pm
Nope, Nate Silver wasn't/isn't a pollster. He uses weighted polls done by others.
fauxnews - July 21, 2016, 11:49 pm
Nah. Nate Silver WAS a good pollster. I also cited Sam Wang back in 2012 too if you actually looked at my posts. The problem with Nate was that he let his successes go right to his head. I abandoned him after 2012 when he became a celebrity...
xyzzy001002 - July 21, 2016, 11:49 pm
and, yes, he uses models, not unlike wang. My wang is probably more accurate.
xyzzy001002 - July 21, 2016, 11:47 pm
That's funny. I looked back at your comments during the last election and you were practically blowing nate silver. Now, when he showed his model was wrong, you abandon him.
fauxnews - July 21, 2016, 11:47 pm
...The problem with Nate Silver is that he did NOT use a model. He went with emotional reasoning. Had he actually used a model, he would've came to the same conclusion that Wang had. The models weren't wrong.The people who ignored them were.Food 4 thought
fauxnews - July 21, 2016, 11:44 pm
...Sam Wang's non-partisan model for prediction is rock solid, unlike Silver.Wang also predicted the GOP takeover of Congress in 2014. However the same data that shows that Trump would win among conservatives shows he loses big with the rest of America...
fauxnews - July 21, 2016, 11:40 pm
...Silver's mistake, like your mistake, was to chose punditry over science (i.e.polling). Wang stuck with the polling, as did I. And we 'both' knew Trump would probably win it because the polls were clear on it...
fauxnews - July 21, 2016, 11:39 pm
Ah, you just stepped into :^) I was following pollster Sam Wang, not the overrated Nate Silver. Wang is his competitor. If you had read Sam, and I did, he disagreed with Silver's lousy prediction that Trump would lose the primary...
xyzzy001002 - July 21, 2016, 11:35 pm
You mean like fivethirtyeight.com? Gosh, they were wrong all along by predicting that support for Trump would die off months and months ago. What happened? Were their models wrong? Yes, they were.
truthteller - July 21, 2016, 9:57 pm
So let’s not get too cute about this one. Trump basically got humiliated on national television. That’s not how these things are supposed to go. I’m still a little bit in shock. Sorry. You can't polish that giant turd.
truthteller - July 21, 2016, 9:56 pm
The crowd starts booing Cruz, and then Trump enters red-faced like a crybaby, almost as if this was the WWE. So he let Cruz speak and then ensured the media would play up the discord within the party. It was a total disaster and the RNC isn't denying it
truthteller - July 21, 2016, 9:54 pm
First, the Trump campaign knew Cruz wouldn’t endorse. They let him speak in prime time anyway.Second, it would have been a smaller story - a la Jerry Brown not endorsing Bill Clinton in 1992 - but Trump couldn’t take the insult.
truthteller - July 21, 2016, 9:53 pm
What are you smoking brother? It was no strategy on Trump's part. He neglected to contain this and Cruz too full advantage of him. Cruz made Trump his b***h. Can I just point out how ridiculous this whole thing is?
fauxnews - July 21, 2016, 9:06 pm
...and if you really think you have something you don't know over reputable non-partisan pollster like Sam Wang, then I guess you have nothing to worry about :^) Besides, you will just blame a conspiracy theory when Trump loses anyways. So who cares...
fauxnews - July 21, 2016, 9:05 pm
P.S. I gave you a thoughtful non-partisan pollster who weighs ALL the polls. Not just national polls. He also uses a model that has effectively predicted Presidencies: http://election.princeton.edu Sorry, but Trump is losing badly at the moment.
fauxnews - July 21, 2016, 9:03 pm
Cherry picking polls and ignoring statically noise. Next.
xyzzy001002 - July 21, 2016, 9:00 pm
Did you notice that I'm using democrat leaning "news" sites for the polling?
xyzzy001002 - July 21, 2016, 8:57 pm
huffing and puffington post: Clinton 43.5% Trump 40.1 (statistical tie)
xyzzy001002 - July 21, 2016, 8:55 pm
46% clinton, 45% trump: www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/poll-clinton-trump-now-tied-gop-convention-kicks-n611936
xyzzy001002 - July 21, 2016, 8:54 pm
USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak poll, which tracks voter preferences daily, now has the two effectively tied, Trump 42%, Clinton 41%.
fauxnews - July 21, 2016, 8:52 pm
http://election.princeton.edu Trump is losing as badly as Romney. But, hey, he still has 20% chance of winning. Who knows? Amazing things can happen yet. A chance is still a chance. Just not probable at this point. Cheers
fauxnews - July 21, 2016, 8:51 pm
Nope. Trump is proving he is Romney lite. I go with the very reputable pollster Sam Wang who has a proven track record and metrology. So, far, this election is breaking just like the last one. Sorry but my science 'trumps' your emotional reasoning.
xyzzy001002 - July 21, 2016, 8:48 pm
Trump is losing if you cherry pick polls. Most polls show a statistical tie.
fauxnews - July 21, 2016, 8:46 pm
What do I have to get upset about? lol...Things are coming up Milhouse for me :^) Trump's losing, and for your prize for throwing a perfect winnable election by settling on a loser,you get to live with Hillary for the next 4 years.Your make a good trophy
xyzzy001002 - July 21, 2016, 8:17 pm
Even your hero, Michael Moore, says Trump will probably win. pffft!
xyzzy001002 - July 21, 2016, 8:16 pm
It was pretty good strategy on Trump's part. Cruz thought he was setting himself up for the 2020 race...Trump let him go on knowing he would hang himself. Even Texas voters are upset with cruz
HillaryHussainObama - July 21, 2016, 6:23 pm
It appears, fauxnews, that I am not the only one taking advantage of your pitifully thin skin and enjoying watching you troll your own meme in a desperate attempt to make yourself believe that your b***ons aren't being pushed, mate.
fauxnews - July 21, 2016, 11:13 am
P.S. Even your partisan, conservatard, propaganda-crap poll is conceding Trump's flailing campaign. You listed a source that says "Hillary Clinton has rebounded", and shows Hillary surging and Trump fading. That's something to brag about?? #spinfail
fauxnews - July 21, 2016, 11:00 am
Really? LOL..The same partisan "rasmussenreports" that predicted Romney and McCain would win? Gee...how did that work out for you :^) Here...try a reputable non-partisan pollster with a proven track record. http://election.princeton.edu You're welcome
fauxnews - July 21, 2016, 10:58 am
Well....it ruined the first 3 days of the RNC. And without a successful convention, you think that helps a candidate win? Staying on message is key. Amateur mistakes = failure to connect with the voters = you don't win.
freasy - July 21, 2016, 9:19 am
"At this point, what difference does it make"
JohnGalt - July 21, 2016, 7:51 am
fauxnews - July 21, 2016, 12:35 am
If it makes you feel better, the Cruz speech tonite (where he gave the Donald the middle finger) is the latest distraction. Trump's latest f*ck up. He approved Cruz's speech when he shouldn't have let him on stage. Watching you guys lose this is fun :^)
fauxnews - July 21, 2016, 12:34 am
Because, it's their election to lose. So you're saying they should go out of their way to screw up? Just to make a point. Uh, huh. And yet, no one seems to care about your excuses. But they ARE still making fun of Trump and CO.
JohnGalt - July 21, 2016, 12:12 am
they were common phrases and the bloodthirsty media wants to rip Trump to shreds. I had to laugh when the speechwriter tendered resignation and Trump would not accept it! If Joe, and company have no repercussions, why do Republicans have to? Bravo!
JohnGalt - July 21, 2016, 12:11 am
you hear how Michelle lifted lines from the movie "John Q", gee I guess not. the media has spent more time doing hit pieces on Trump than the the FBI spent on investigating Hillary!
fauxnews - July 20, 2016, 9:49 pm
"desperation" = wishful thinking.Trump's doing badly in the polls,lost 36+ hours of convention time to the Melania goof-up,lost faith from the GOP establishment,etc.Hillary is ecstatic she got Trump.It's the GOP's election to lose,and they are,badly(2/2)
fauxnews - July 20, 2016, 9:44 pm
As far as how "desperate" the democrats are....not too sure about that.Remember, virtually every main GOP speaker in the RNC today is conceding in their own way that Trump will probably lose, posturing for 2020 (i.e.Cruz,Rubio,Walker.etc).(1/2)
fauxnews - July 20, 2016, 9:39 pm
Funny how you made this BEFORE the Trump campaign finally conceded in a statement that one of Melania's speech writers did in fact plagiarize Michelle Obama's speech and apologized for it. If it was ONLY common phrases, there would be NO apology.#spinFAIL